Papers with argumentative strategies
DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Neha Kennard, Tim O’Gorman, Rajarshi Das, Akshay Sharma, Chhandak Bagchi, Matthew Clinton, Pranay Kumar Yelugam, Hamed Zamani, Andrew McCallum
| Challenge: | Prior work on labeling arguments extracted from peer review text has focused qualified labor force on labelling arguments extracted by the text. |
| Approach: | They synthesize label sets from prior work and extend them to include fine-grained annotations of review and rebuttal sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset synthesizes label sets from prior work and extends them to include fine-grained annotation of review and rebuttal sentences. |
ArgGenBench: Benchmarking the Complex Controlled Argument Generation Capability of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on limited control signals such as topic, stance, length, style, strategy, audience, and key aspects, failing to capture this complexity. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that integrates multi-dimensional control into a single instruction to evaluate LLMs' ability to produce persuasive arguments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that existing models fail to capture multifaceted argumentative control signals. |